Skip to main content Watercolor decoration

What is the SSPX Resistance?

The SSPX Resistance is the traditionalist core of the work of Archbishop Lefebvre. For people new to the traditionalist cause, this document explains why we exist and why the fight for the Catholic Faith — not just the Catholic Mass — is important.

similar ⁠

For centuries, the Catholic Church was the unyielding bulwark against the forces of irreligion and social decay. Yet, its most devastating wounds did not come from without, but from within, as a long-planned subversion by liberal and Masonic elements took root, ultimately leading to the profound crisis of faith we witness today.

This crisis did not emerge suddenly. It was the culmination of a patient, covert infiltration, an „Operation Suicide‟ executed over generations to transform the Church from a defender of immutable Truth into a mirror of the modern world.

The Roots of the Crisis: A Centuries-Long Infiltration

The forces hostile to Christ the King understood that the Catholic Church, with her divine constitution and unyielding doctrine, stood as the primary obstacle to their revolutionary designs. The strategy was clear: not outright destruction, but subtle subversion.

Beginning of Freemasonry and its Revolutionary Agenda

Organized Freemasonry, emerging prominently in the early 18th century, dedicated itself to spreading the principles of the French Revolution: „liberty, equality, fraternity.‟ This seemingly benign slogan masked a radical agenda: to replace divine authority and Truth with human sovereignty, where „truth‟ and „morality‟ would be decided „from below.‟ This was a direct assault on the very foundations of Christendom.

The Alta Vendita: A Blueprint for Subversion

Around 1829, documents from the Italian Masonic lodge „Alta Vendita‟ revealed a chilling blueprint for the infiltration of the Catholic Church. Their explicit goal was not to convert Popes, but to raise a new generation of clergy imbued with liberal principles, leading eventually to the election of „a Pope according to our wants‟:

We must find a Pope who convenes a council where our clergy makes the revolution in tiara and choir robe.

This prophetic statement precisely describes what would unfold over a century later. Popes Pius IX and Leo XIII valiantly exposed and condemned Freemasonry, issuing encyclicals like Pascendi that prophetically warned against the „synthesis of all heresies‟ – Modernism.

The Rise of Modernism Within

Despite the condemnations, the insidious influence of Modernism, a theological system that reinterprets Catholic doctrine through the lens of subjective experience and evolving truth, continued to spread. Figures like Cardinal Rampolla, Leo XIII’s Secretary of State, fostered this movement by placing sympathetic individuals in key ecclesiastical positions, notably in seminaries.

Pope St. Pius X, in his 1907 encyclical Pascendi Dominici Gregis, denounced Modernism with unparalleled clarity:

For as We have said, they put their designs for her ruin into operation not from without but from within; hence, the danger is present almost in the very veins and heart of the Church, whose injury is the more certain, the more intimate is their knowledge of her. Moreover they lay the axe not to the branches and shoots, but to the very root, that is, to the faith and its deepest fires.

He famously stated that he had merely „driven them underground, where they will continue their work.‟ This grim prophecy proved true, as the network of Modernists patiently awaited their moment.

Vatican II (1962-1965): The Revolution Realized

The election of John XXIII in 1958 and his subsequent convocation of the Second Vatican Council marked the culmination of this long infiltration. The Council, rather than condemning the errors of the modern world, sought to „reconcile‟ the Church with it. This was not a council of tradition, but one that, in its ambiguous texts, sowed the seeds of rupture.

Key Errors and Their Destructive Fruits

Vatican II, guided by periti (theological experts) previously suspected or condemned by the Holy Office, introduced or fostered principles that directly contradicted perennial Catholic teaching:

  • Religious Liberty: The declaration of a „right‟ to religious freedom, even for false religions, directly undermined the social kingship of Christ and the duty of states to recognize the True Faith. This effectively granted error equal rights with truth.
  • Ecumenism: A false unity that promotes interfaith dialogue for its own sake, blurring doctrinal distinctions and implying that all religions contain elements of truth, thus trivializing the unique salvific role of the Catholic Church.
  • Collegiality: The promotion of a democratic understanding of Church governance, diminishing the monarchical authority of the Pope and bishops.
  • Man-centered Theology: Most fundamentally, the Council documents, notably Gaudium et Spes, shifted the focus from God as the ultimate end to man himself.

According to the almost unanimous opinion of believers and unbelievers alike, all things on earth should be related to man as their center and crown.

This Promethean humanism, declaring „Christ… fully reveals man to man himself,‟ is the antithesis of true Catholicism, which reveals God to man. It subordinates divine glory to human self-realization, making religion a tool for man’s comfort rather than his salvation. This is the poison that infects the entire conciliar system.

The New Mass (Novus Ordo Missae): A Liturgical Betrayal

The Novus Ordo Mass, promulgated in 1969, was the inevitable liturgical expression of this man-centered „faith.‟ Designed explicitly to be acceptable to Protestants, it deliberately stripped away elements that clearly articulated the sacrificial nature of the Mass and the role of the priesthood, replacing them with ambiguous language and gestures. This liturgy, as Fr. Gregorius Hesse noted, is „against the Divine Law‟ because it embodies the conciliar errors.

Archbishop Lefebvre and the SSPX: "Operation Survival"

While most of the 3500 bishops at the Council compromised or fell silent to maintain their positions, a lone voice rose in uncompromising defense of Tradition: Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre.

The Uncompromising Stand

The Archbishop recognized that the Council represented a profound rupture. In his foundational Declaration of November 21, 1974, he clearly articulated his position:

We adhere with all our heart, with all our soul to Catholic Rome, Guardian of the Catholic Faith and of the traditions necessary to preserve this faith, to Eternal Rome, Mistress of wisdom and truth.

We refuse, on the other hand, and have always refused to follow the Rome of neo-Modernist and neo-Protestant tendencies which were clearly evident in the Second Vatican Council and, after the Council, in all the reforms which issued from it.

He understood that these reforms, „issued from liberalism, from modernism, [are] entirely poisoned; it comes from heresy and leads to heresy.‟ His refusal to submit was not rebellion against true authority, but fidelity to the Faith itself, knowing that „obedience‟ to commands that destroy the Faith is a betrayal of God.

Founding the SSPX: A Bastion of Tradition

In 1970, Archbishop Lefebvre founded the Priestly Society of Saint Pius X (SSPX) to preserve the Catholic priesthood, the Traditional Latin Mass, and sound doctrine amidst the universal devastation. This was „Operation Survival‟ – a lifeboat for souls in the deluge of Modernism.

The 1988 Consecrations: An Act of Supreme Necessity

Despite repeated attempts to dialogue with Rome and obtain permission for the consecration of bishops to ensure the SSPX’s survival, Archbishop Lefebvre encountered constant demands to compromise on the Council. Faced with Rome’s unwavering commitment to Modernism and the imminent threat of his own death, he made the agonizing, but heroic, decision to consecrate four bishops on June 30, 1988, without papal mandate.

This was not schism, but an act of „Operation Survival‟ to prevent the extinction of the Catholic priesthood and episcopate, as he clarified:

This day is the operation „survival.‟ And if I had made this other operation with Rome, following the agreements we had signed and putting into practice afterwards these agreements, I would have made the operation „suicide.‟

This act, for which he and the consecrated bishops were „excommunicated‟ (an unjust and invalid decree in the eyes of Traditional Catholics), secured the continuation of the Traditional Mass and Sacraments.

The FSSP: Controlled Opposition

Immediately following the 1988 consecrations, certain priests departed the SSPX to form the Priestly Fraternity of Saint Peter (FSSP) under Roman authority. While offering the Traditional Latin Mass, these groups, known as „Ecclesia Dei‟ communities, accepted Vatican II and the legitimacy of the New Mass in exchange for canonical „recognition.‟ This was seen by Archbishop Lefebvre and his true followers as a „fatal compromise‟ and a form of „controlled opposition‟ orchestrated by Rome to neutralize true Tradition.

As Bishop Williamson stated, the FSSP acted as a „docile decoy‟ to draw souls away from the uncompromising stance of the SSPX, allowing Rome to continue dismantling the Church without robust internal resistance.

The "Thaw" and the Neo-SSPX: A Slow Slide Towards Compromise

After the death of Archbishop Lefebvre in 1991, the SSPX, under new leadership (Bishop Bernard Fellay elected in 1994), embarked on a path of rapprochement with Modernist Rome, a path that ultimately led to a tragic deviation from its founder’s principles.

Secret Talks and False Hopes (The GREC Talks)

Beginning in the late 1990s, unofficial dialogues, known as the „GREC Talks‟ (Group of Reflection Among Catholics), took place. These meetings, often kept secret from the broader SSPX faithful and even from other traditional communities, aimed at „reconciliation‟ between the SSPX and Rome. The stated goal was to „interpret Vatican II in the light of Tradition‟ — a concept of „hermeneutics of continuity‟ promoted by Benedict XVI that attempts to paper over the Council’s inherent ruptures.

The 2009 "Thaw" and the Williamson Affair

In 2009, Pope Benedict XVI lifted the „excommunications‟ of the four SSPX bishops. This was presented as a gesture of benevolence, but it came with immediate pressure for the SSPX to accept Vatican II. Conveniently, a controverted interview by Bishop Williamson (questioning aspects of the Holocaust narrative) was aired just as the decree was published. This „Williamson Affair‟ was exploited by Rome and elements within the SSPX to pressurize the Society and isolate its most outspoken bishop against any compromise. Bishop Williamson was publicly condemned and eventually removed from his post as seminary rector.

The subsequent „doctrinal discussions‟ (2009-2011) between SSPX and Roman theologians proved that Rome’s commitment to Vatican II remained unwavering. Yet, the SSPX leadership continued to pursue a „practical agreement.‟

The 2012 Crisis: "Operation Suicide" Revisited

The pivotal moment arrived in 2012. On April 15, 2012, Bishop Fellay, the SSPX Superior General, presented a secretly drafted „Doctrinal Declaration‟ to Rome. This ambiguous document hinted at an acceptance of Vatican II „in the light of Tradition,‟ a concession fundamentally at odds with Archbishop Lefebvre’s categorical rejection of the Council’s errors.

The full extent of this shift was revealed when, on April 7, 2012, the other three SSPX bishops—Richard Williamson, Bernard Tissier de Mallerais, and Alfonso de Galarreta—sent a collective letter to Bishop Fellay, warning him against signing a purely practical agreement without Rome’s conversion:

The doctrinal discussions have proved that it is impossible to reach an agreement with the current Rome… after the Second Vatican Council, the official authorities of the Church departed from Catholic truth and today they are determined as before to remain faithful to the Conciliar doctrine and practice.

Bishop Fellay’s response accused them of lacking „Romanitas‟ and being „too absolute‟ in their resistance, confirming his willingness to proceed with an agreement.

The July 2012 SSPX General Chapter, despite internal resistance, effectively abandoned the principle of „no canonical agreement without doctrinal agreement.‟ It set vague conditions for a canonical regularization that no longer required Rome to abandon its Modernist errors. Bishop Williamson, a staunch opponent of this new direction, was illegitimately excluded from the Chapter and, shortly thereafter, expelled from the SSPX on October 4, 2012.

The Path of Compromise Continues

Since 2012, the SSPX leadership has progressively softened its stance:

  • Acceptance of papal jurisdiction for confessions (2015 Jubilee) and marriages (2017), presented as „pastoral solicitude‟ by Rome, but seen by the Resistance as further binding the SSPX to the Modernist hierarchy.
  • The continued rhetoric of accepting „95% of the Council,‟ which undermines the clear condemnations made by Archbishop Lefebvre.
  • The pursuit of a „Prelature Personal‟ status from Rome, fulfilling the very „Operation Suicide‟ scenario the Archbishop warned against.
  • A notable softening of criticism against Pope Francis and the Conciliar Church, aligning with the „controlled opposition‟ model.

The SSPX Resistance: Continuing the True Combat

The SSPX Resistance emerged in response to this tragic deviation within the SSPX itself. It is not a new foundation, but simply the continuation of Archbishop Lefebvre’s original „Operation Survival‟ in its purity, unwilling to compromise with the Modernist errors that continue to plague the Church and society.

Why the Resistance Must Exist

The SSPX Resistance exists because the SSPX leadership, by seeking practical agreements with an unconverted Rome, has risked becoming part of the very problem it was founded to fight. The core principle of the Resistance is unwavering: First doctrine, then canonical recognition. There can be no true reconciliation with error.

The decay of modern society, rooted in the rejection of objective Truth and the enthronement of man, is a direct consequence of the very errors promoted by Vatican II. When „all religions are true‟ or „man is his own center,‟ all moral standards collapse, leading to profound spiritual and social chaos. The Resistance holds that to fight this decay effectively, one cannot compromise with its spiritual source within the Church.

Leadership and Continuity

Those who comprise the Resistance – priests, religious, and faithful – recognized the necessity of maintaining the uncompromised fight for the Faith. To ensure the continuation of truly Catholic sacraments and the formation of faithful priests, new episcopal consecrations became necessary.

  • Bishop Richard Williamson: After his expulsion, he became the leading voice and episcopal support for the Resistance, traveling worldwide to administer confirmations and ordain priests in fidelity to Archbishop Lefebvre’s legacy.
  • Bishop Jean-Michel Faure SAJM: Consecrated by Bishop Williamson on March 19, 2015. A long-time priest of the SSPX, he founded the Society of the Apostles of Jesus and Mary (SAJM) in August 2016. The SAJM is a new priestly society dedicated to priestly formation and combatting Modernism without compromise. Its statutes explicitly reject any canonical regularization with Rome until Rome returns to Tradition.
  • Bishop Tomás de Aquino OSB: Consecrated by Bishop Williamson, assisted by Bishop Faure, on March 19, 2016. He leads the Benedictine Monastery of the Holy Cross in Brazil, a spiritual bastion of Tradition.
  • Bishop Gerardo Zendejas SAJM: Consecrated by Bishop Williamson, assisted by Bishops Faure and Aquino, on May 11, 2017. He works to provide true Catholic sacraments and doctrine in North America and beyond, as a member of the SAJM.

The Resistance Today: Shepherds in the Storm

The SSPX Resistance is not defined by personality, but by loyalty to Christ the King and His immutable Truth. It is not a sedevacantist movement; like Archbishop Lefebvre, its bishops recognize the Pope as Pope but firmly resist his liberal and modernist commands that deviate from Tradition, following the example of St. Paul resisting St. Peter when he was in error (Gal. 2:11).

This involves:

  • Unwavering fidelity to all perennial Catholic doctrine, morality, and liturgy.
  • Categorical rejection of Vatican II’s errors and the Novus Ordo Mass.
  • Refusal of any „practical agreement‟ with Modernist Rome until Rome converts and unequivocally condemns its errors.
  • Providing true Catholic sacraments and spiritual guidance to the faithful who seek an uncompromised path to salvation.

Conclusion: Why This Matters

The battle for the Faith is not an academic exercise; it is a fight for the eternal salvation of souls and the very future of civilization. The SSPX Resistance exists as a living testimony that the True Faith cannot be extinguished by diplomatic maneuvering or false obedience.

In a world and a Church increasingly ravaged by Modernism, relativism, and moral decay, the Resistance stands as a beacon of uncompromising Catholicism. It is a call to all faithful to understand the depth of the current crisis and to choose fidelity to Christ and His unchangeable Truth above all else. For those who seek the perennial springs of Catholic Faith, the SSPX Resistance offers a clear path, maintaining the flame of Tradition lit by Archbishop Lefebvre, waiting for the day when the True Light of Tradition will dispel the darkness from eternal Rome.

Sources

  • 00408_importancia-del-libro-prometeo-la.html.txt (On humanism, linking Gaudium et Spes to „religion of man‟)
  • 00007_una-jerarquia-para-dos-iglesias.html.txt (Explaining the „two churches‟ concept, implicitly justifying resistance without sedevacantism)
  • Pascendi Dominici Gregis (September 8, 1907) _ PIUS X.html (Pius X’s condemnation of Modernism, „synthesis of all heresies,‟ internal danger)
  • declaration-1974.md (Archbishop Lefebvre’s 1974 Declaration, core statement of SSPX’s original stance)
  • 00016_sermon-de-mons-lefebvre-en-la-ceremonia.html.txt (Archbishop Lefebvre’s 1988 Consecration Sermon, „Operation Survival‟ vs. „Operation Suicide‟)
  • fssp (Implicitly from index.md file about FSSP, detailing their compromise)
  • 00081_el-grec-y-la-fsspx-por-la-necesaria.html.txt (Details on the GREC talks and their agenda)
  • 00021_revelan-intercambio-de-cartas-entre-el.html.txt (Crucial 2012 letters between Fellay and the three bishops, revealing the SSPX’s internal crisis and Fellay’s shift)
  • 00003_cronologia-del-suicidio-de-la-fsspx.html.txt (Timeline of key events including Williamson’s expulsion and the SSPX’s shift)
  • 01113_informe-especial-la-expulsion-de.html.txt (Details on Williamson’s expulsion and the political context)
  • 01663_un-gran-paso-hacia-el-acuerdo-francisco.html.txt (Francis granting confession faculties to SSPX)
  • 02218_el-papa-concede-la-fsspx-facultades.html.txt (Francis granting marriage faculties to SSPX)
  • 01385_entrevista-exclusiva-mons-jean-michel.html.txt (Bishop Faure’s perspective on the crisis and his consecration)
  • 01900_declaracion-de-los-obispos-de-la.html.txt (Declaration of Resistance Bishops, articulating their purpose)
  • 02006_mons-faure-ha-fundado-una-nueva.html.txt (Founding of SAJM and its statutes)
  • 02219_entrevista-mons-williamson-acerca-de-la.html.txt (Bishop Williamson’s rationale for new consecrations)
  • 02342_entrevista-mons-faure-en-el-primer.html.txt (Bishop Faure on SAJM’s mission and adherence to Lefebvre)
  • 02422_estatutos-de-la-sajm.html.txt (SAJM Statutes: „Society discards any possibility of canonical regularization… until the Catholic Hierarchy returns to the Tradition‟)
  • index.md (The „fssp‟ file’s content on the FSSP being controlled opposition and Fr. Hesse’s quote on FSSP not being Catholic.)
  • index.md (The „europe‟ file’s content on societal decay related to loss of truth and God’s kingship.)
  • index.md (The „infiltration‟ file’s content regarding the Alta Vendita and the „revolution in tiara and cope.‟)

Similar articles